NRC ramps up inspection at Va. nuclear plant; earthquake may have exceeded plant’s design base – Signs That Utilities Knew Of Shortfall

Author: 2 Comments Share:

WASHINGTON — The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is sending additional inspectors to the Virginia nuclear power plant closest to the epicenter of last week’s earthquake.

Tuesday’s earthquake may have exceeded the design basis for seismic events at the North Anna Power Station in Mineral. That’s according to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, in an event report this morning. Tuesday’s earthquake was a 5.8 magnitude quake.

The plant was designed to withstand a magnitude 6.2 earthquake. But monitoring equipment at the plant showed that the quake, at higher frequencies, may have exceeded that design.

“Scratch plates” that record ground motion at Unit 1 were sent to a lab for analysis. An NRC spokesman this morning said the agency is monitoring the post-quake analysis.

The company and the NRC have said there was no damage to critical components of the plant. Meantime, the two reactors at North Anna are shut down as an in-house evaluation continues. There’s no word on how long the reactors will be shut down.

The only known damage from the earthquake was in an on-site substation. A failure there cut power to the main station when the earthquake hit at 1:51 p.m. yesterday. The two reactors automatically shut down, as designed.

North Anna was designed and built in the 1970s. In 2005, NRC staff recommended that the agency take a new look at the seismic design basis of all older US plants, given new findings about seismic hazards in the last several decades.

The staff report admitted, however, that a great deal of data on how plants were actually built was missing, and NRC is in the process of gathering that data for eastern and Midwestern plants, a process slated to go into 2012. Only then does NRC plan to decide whether action is needed.

But after an earthquake and tsunami hit the Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan in March, NRC performed special inspections to assess US plants’ capabilities to withstand similar assaults. At North Anna and other stations, that inspection found some equipment important to fighting fires and withstanding floods that was not designed as earthquake-resistant. All operators involved, including Dominion, have been evaluating how to respond to the NRC findings.

Previous Article

Leaked Documents Show US Lobbying for GE for China building plans for 50 nuclear power plants by 2020 using 60s era technology.

Next Article

The Great Unknown – Experts split on how to decommission Fukushima nuclear plant – 50 Years May Not Be Enough Time

2 Comments

  1. Although critical safety components may be intact (pending exhaustive analysis and inspection), the non-critical components most likely are lunch. These include, Main Steam, Condensate, Circulating Water, Turbine, Generator, Hydrogen and Nitrogen Storage, Switchyard, Water Treatment, Ventilation, etc. These are the pieces that make the electricity. Isn’t this the point of a nuclear power plant?

    I’m glad that there won’t be a melt-down, but I am not so glad that North Anna may be down for the count anyway.

    BTW, Fort Calhoun will be requiring similar inspections and repairs to its non-safety related, but $ making systems. Could external events have mothballed two different sites this year? Why are so many Design Bases being exceeded? Is it time to re-evaluate those bases that are written in clay, instead of stone?

  2. All of these plants are under designed from a safety stand point because of money. It is a matter of time until the next problem. They are putting the public at risk by extending the 30 year life of the plants to 40 and more. This causes problems of multiple break downs at the same time, safety features are designed to about three problems at ounce beyond that it is a crap shoot as it is a complex problem. How many years of leaked radiation will it take to make most of the land and sea uninhabitable, we have several area’s already and it has just begun with few plants over 40 years old and getting older and more of them. This industry has to be shut down as experimenting with design is to risky.

Leave a Reply