Cc:Tobin. Jennifer; Ridge. Christianne; Deavers. Ron
Subject:RE: FYI – concerns about Radnet not being public friendly
Date:Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:58:59 PM
I know. Radnet, quite honestly, sucks
From: Bonaccorso, Amy
To: Harrington, Holly
Cc: Tobin, Jennifer; Ridge, Christianne; Deavers, Ron
Sent: Thu Mar 17 16:28:16 2011
Subject: FYI – concerns about Radnet not being public friendly
Christianne just explained to me…..
RadNet isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. People have to go through a registration process and the Web site does not give dose. It gives a lot of highly technical information that the public would have no chance of interpreting. We had someone go to that site and email us back with the info for an interpretation…so essentially he was going around in a circle…
It also doesn’t give info about EPA’s monitoring of milk, etc.
It’s what is available – but I guess we just need to be careful about promoting it as a public friendly Web site with a lot of information that is easy to understand.
- March 16th, 2011- ABC News Wants confirmation that things are definitely taking a turn for the worse – Per Holly – ignoring media calls (enformable.com)
- March 16th, 2011 – I got a few emails forwarded from Holly and was set to ignore them…Let’s make a generic response (enformable.com)
- March 15th 2011 – NRC does not have a take on checking planes from Japan for radiation contamination in Hawaii (enformable.com)