March 16th 2011 – Confusion Created by 50 mile evacuation

Author: No Comments Share:

From:LIA04 Hoc
Sent:Wednesday, March 16, 2011 3:49 PM
To:Deavers, Ron; Bonaccorso, Amy
Cc:OST05 Hoc; McNamara, Nancy
Subject:FW: Questions NRC RI Is Receiving – RESPONSE NEEDED ASAP

Importance: High

Ron and Amy:
You may wish to touch base with our PMT folks for insights. I can’t help on this.

Richard Turtil
State Liaison – Liaison Team
Incident Response Center

From: McNamara, Nancy
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 3:24 PM
To: LIA04 Hoc; OST05 Hoc
Subject: Questions NRC RI Is Receiving – RESPONSE NEEDED ASAP
Importance: High

1. How is it that the NRC has always defined the emergency planning zone to be out to 10 miles based on worse case scenarios, yet they just recommended a 50 mile evacuation?

2. What does a PAR out to 50 miles say about the current 10 mile EPZ used here in the United States?

Previous Article

March 16th, 2011 – Where the NRC deeply regrets MSNBC’s reporter using the GI 199 Data against them

Next Article

March 15th 2011 – NRC does not have a take on checking planes from Japan for radiation contamination in Hawaii

Leave a Reply