From: King, Mark’
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 4:10 PM
To: Haskell, Russell; Bernardo, Robert
Subject: RE: RIS to licensees on radioisotopes that are detected from the Japanese event
Bob / Russ
I think that should be left up to the team developing the RIS, what do they want? -I’d talk with Dave Garmon, Tanya (other Generic Communications) / technical contact(s) for the RIS — ask them…
I don’t think there is any problems letting our internal folks this is coming… in the summary.
But… in the .long run it will be the licensees who have to supply the requested info.., so it probably makes little difference either way. In other words, do as you see fit, but I would see this as having little upside for putting it in the summary ..
But a potential downside if you put it in and then it changes / you say something wrong and it gets out.
Based on that I would leave it out unless directed otherwise… once the RIS is approved/’finalized’ certainly fair game to link to it or attach it so that everyone on distribution is aware of the new RIS
Mark
From: Haskell, Russell
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 2:48 PM
To. Bernardo, Robert; King, Mark
Subject: RE: RIS to licensees on radioisotopes that are detected from the Japanese event
Should this message be included in the C/H summary tomorrow …….. ? Or is that somebody else’s domain ……
From: Bernardo, Robert — >o,,”
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 2:45 PM
To: King, Mark
Cc: Haskell, Russell
Subject: FW: RIS to licensees on radioisotopes that are detected from the Japanese event
FYI, more information on the RIS. By the way, now Limerick and TMI are reporting having found 1-131 in
rainwater samples. I’ve passed along results to Richard Conatser.
Bob Bernatdo
Reactor Systems Engineer
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NRR/DIRS/IOEB
Mail Stop: O-7C02A
301-415-2621
[email protected]
From: Shoop, Undine
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 2:16 PM
To: Dickson, Billy; Henderson, Pamela; Werner, Greg; Bonser, Brian
Cc: Burnell, Scott; Glitter, Joseph; Brown, Frederick; Westreich, Barry; Nelson, Robert
Subject: RIS to licensees on radioisotopes that are detected from the Japanese event
All,
Related articles
- Two Pennsylvania Nuclear Power Plants Experience Major Loss of Emergency Preparedness Capabilities (enformable.com)
- March 16th, 2011 – The NRC Thought The Best Response After Fukushima Was to Verify What Licensees Were Already Required To Do (enformable.com)
- March 26th, 2011 – Decommissioning Type Information – (enformable.com)
- March 23rd, 2011 – Response to what are we not getting done – Gerard Purciarello (enformable.com)
- Observations Of Fallout From The Fukushima Reactor Accident In San Francisco Bay Area Rainwater (habwwe.wordpress.com)
- Fukushima radiation spread as far as Romania – Bioaccumulation of I-131 in Sheep and Goat Milk (enformable.com)
- March 14th, 2011 – Seismic PRAs do not consider damage from earthquake aftershocks – Need to predict the fragility of the plant SSCs following the main shock (enformable.com)
- March 11th, 2011 – Premonitions of North Anna EQ – Why does the NRC have confidence that an eq greater than DB cannot occur in the US (enformable.com)
- March 23rd, 2011 – Questions on Boric Acid Solubility in Seawater (enformable.com)
- TEPCO Earthquake Information Update as of March 14, 2300(JST) – Fukushima Daini Unit 1 in Cold Shutdown – All Fuel Became Uncovered AGAIN (enformable.com)
- June 30th, 2011 – Update on a Review of REMP Direct Radiation Programs and ANSI N13.37 (enformable.com)
- March 23rd, 2011 – Response to What We Are Not Getting Done – Joseph G. Glitter (enformable.com)
- March 17th, 2011 – What you ask for, isn’t always what you get – How the NRC internally communicates about the Freedom of Information Act (enformable.com)
- March 14th, 2011 – Indications of Breach of Containment at Reactor 2 (enformable.com)
- March 23rd, 2011 – Response to what are we not getting done – Samuel Miranda (enformable.com)
