From: Powers, Dana A [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 12:00 PM
To: Lee, Richard
Subject: RE: Budnitz Garwin Per show

I do not. They probably said, but it went in one ear and out the other. It may be listed in the minutes if they issue a set. Dana

Thx, Dana:

Do you know who from NRC call in?

Richard

From: Powers, Dana A [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 5:56 PM
To: Lee, Richard
Subject: Budnitz Garwin Per show

NOAA has completed apparently a detailed analysis of the tsunami showing among other things that peak wave heights at some points in Japan were as much as 37 meters!

It will be of interest to see the NOAA analysis once it is published. (Garwin is of course suspicious of the analysis).

TEPCO is confident that water level in spent fuel pool is well above the top of the active fuel -6 meters – Garwin is dubious.

Per continues his work to do a shaker table test on water sloshing – despite all expert assurances water did not slosh out and no one really cares now.

BNL continues to work on the Markov model that I don’t even begin to understand – Budnitz has done similar things in the past. Garwin is unpersuaded.

They are still looking at phosphate for pH control. They recognize the issue of precipitation. They may not recognize that phosphate will enhance uranium dioxide dissolution in oxygenated systems.

Per wants them to handle the contaminated water. Garwin wants to know why we are not getting more definitive information.

In other words, you did not miss a thing! Dana

[toggle_simple title=”Related articles” width=”600″]

Related articles

• March 18th 2011 – It might be good to know the effects of salt deposition on cooling of BWR fuel assemblies (enformable.com)
• April 1st, 2011 – Remove as much spent fuel from pools as technically feasible (enformable.com)
• April 18th, 2011 – NISA/TEPCO Meeting – 778 Workers at Fukushima Daiichi (enformable.com)
• March 18th, 2011 – There’s Got to be a ton of loose materials floating in the SFP – I would not be surprised if the top 10 feet or so of the sfp was sloshed out (enformable.com)
• March 25th, 2011 – Can we predict a tsunami wave height? – Are the models valid? (enformable.com)
• March 29th, 2011 – Status of 3 Units and 4 pools – Realistic Scenarios (enformable.com)
• March 16th, 2011 – Assessing SFP Damage – SOARCA – Uncovered Spent Fuel Reports – Leak at Unit 4 SFP (enformable.com)
• April 1st, 2011 – Bet the Japanese wished they had used more of these… (enformable.com)
• March 27th, 2011 – Salt effects on molten core materials – Effects on energetics (enformable.com)

[/toggle_simple]

• Tags: BWR, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, TEPCO