March 15th, 2011 Deflect any questions about scary numbers with the “we’ll review for scientific validity”

Author: 2 Comments Share:

From: Burnell. Scott
To: Hannah. Roger; Ledford, Joey; Screnci, Diane; Sheehan, Neil; Chandrathil. Prema; Mitlyno, Viktoria; Useldino,
Lara; Harrington, Holly; McIntyre, David; Couret, Ivonne
Cc: Brenner, Eliot; Hayden, Elizabeth
Subject: FW: Estimated Fatalities for US Nuclear Plant Spent Fuel Fires: 77,000
Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 4:53:53 PM

The gentleman has submitted a petition; the NRC will review it to determine if it has any scientific validity. The NRC believes spent fuel pools are safe, even in cases of extended
blackouts, given the very low heat levels involved and the ease with which the pools can be refilled. In some cases analysis has shown the spent fuel can be safely air-cooled.

[[deflect any questions about scary numbers with the “we’ll review for scientific validity”]]


From: Thomas Popik [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 4:35 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Estimated Fatalities for US Nuclear Plant Spent Fuel Fires: 77,000

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

March 15, 2011

FIRE BREAKS OUT AT SPENT FUEL POOL FOR FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI UNIT 4

ESTIMATED FATALITIES FOR US NUCLEAR PLANT SPENT FUEL FIRES WOULD BE 77,000 NASHUA NH (March 15)–The recently reported spent fuel pool fire at Fukushima Daiichi Unit 4 demonstrated the vulnerability of nuclear power plants to loss of outside power. The Unit 4 spent fuel pool has been without outside power for cooling circulation pumps since the earthquake on March 11.

The Foundation for Resilient Societies has projected there would be widespread United States fatalities from spent fuel pool fires should there be a similar loss of outside power  from natural disaster. Using data supplied by Oak Ridge National Laboratories, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the US Census Bureau, the Foundation estimates fatalities of 77,000. United States population within 10 miles of nuclear power plants exceeds 3.5 million. Detailed information about data sources is provided in a Petition for Rulemaking submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on March 14 and available for download at www.resilientsocieties.org. The Petition contains fatality estimates for all 104 operating nuclear power plants in the United States.

Spent fuel pools are present at all operating nuclear power plants. Fuel rods continue to generate substantial heat after removal from the reactor core, necessitating active cooling in water pools. There are 104 nuclear power reactors operating in the United States at 65.sites in 31 states. Each site has one or more spent fuel pools. Spent fuel contains a number of radioactive elements resulting from fission within the reactor core, the most significant being Ruthenium-106 with a half-life of one year and Cesium-137 with a half-life of 30 years. Should spent fuel rods become uncovered by water as a result of boiling, the zirconium cladding of the rods would likely catch fire.

While there are multiple scenarios that could cause uncovering of spent fuel rods and result in zirconium fire, the most significant scenario is long-term loss of outside power
supplied by the commercial electric grid. Current design criteria for nuclear power plants and associated spent fuel pools assume reliable and quickly restored commercial grid power. In the event of a long-term loss of commercial grid power, it is likely that water in spent fuel pools would heat up and boil-off, fuel rods would become uncovered by water, zirconium cladding would catch fire, and large quantities of radioactive elements would be released into the atmosphere.

The Petition of the Foundation for Resilient Societies, submitted to the NRC on February 14, proposes requirements for unattended spent fuel pool cooling at nuclear power plants.

For more information contact Thomas Popik, Foundation for Resilient Societies, email thomasp(resilientsocieties.org, phone 603-321-1090.


Previous Article

Wolf Creek Nuclear Station still shutdown over 1 month after loss of off-site power

Next Article

March 13th, 2011 – Fukushima Unit 1 Core Damage and Release of fission products

2 Comments

  1. We are now are being ruled by those in Nuclear Denial*; instead of by Leaders that demand an end to the Trillion Dollar Eco-Disast­er RISK that Nuclear poses to mankind! The nuclear industry is fighting tooth and nail to maintain it’s market share; yet NOW Solar (of all flavors) is far less costly to construct, faster to construct and carries with it N☢ Nuclear radioactiv­e baggage that can kill a Countries economy and or those living nearby!
    Ask The Japanese!

    *Nuclear Denial
    http://is.­gd/XPjMd0
    The illogical belief that Nature cannot destroy any land based nuclear reactor, any place anytime 24/7/365!
    Remember Nature does not follow design basis calculations or even engineering RISK formulas…

    +++++

    Here is my explanation of the Black G☢☢

    I believe that the reason for the high Cesium counts is the interaction of Earth Quakes (EQ’s) with the Coirium(s) with the groundwater below the complex and that may even be cause of the Black Dust that is now being widely observed in Northern Japan.

    EQ’s + H☢T Corium(s) + Ground water = (Hydro Corium) Fissioning

    Fissioning + Time => Radioactive Steam Releases => Black Dust aka Black G☢☢

Leave a Reply