JAEA found making quiet agreements with nuclear plant makers in preparation for Monju restart

The Japanese central government is reviewing the national energy strategy in the wake of the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe.

The prototype fast-breeder reactor Monju was considered a key component to achieve the nuclear fuel cycle policy, in which uranium and plutonium extracted from spent fuel would be reused as reactor fuel, but progress has been sluggish, even though more than ¥1 trillion has been spent for Monju’s maintenance and construction.

In December last year, the Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Ministry decided that Monju would undergo only maintenance work and safety measures until the government announced its new nuclear energy policy.

The JAEA repaired a fuel exchanging device which had dropped into the reactor and restored it to its proper location on May 28. The reactor is expected to be fully repaired by mid-June.

At a meeting of the Japan Atomic Energy Commission’s new nuclear energy policy panel at the end of May, the ministry presented four options on the fate of Monju, including decommissioning the reactor, launching a full-fledged debate on whether to close the reactor for good.

However it has recently been found that the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) used funds that were allocated last fiscal year to make contracts with Toshiba Corp. and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. for approximately 100 million yen in preparation for possible reactivation of the reactor to sign contracts with two nuclear power plant makers in late March in preparation for tests at the prototype fast-breeder reactor Monju, though the government has yet to decide on the reactor’s fate.

An official of JAEA explained that it needed to make all possible preparations in anticipation of reactivation approval.

“We’re working through plans to promptly reactivate the reactor after the government adopts its new atomic energy policy. We did what we could do to prepare for reactivation even before the new policy was adopted,” the official said.

Hideyuki Ban, co-leader of the Citizens’ Nuclear Information Center, condemned JAEA’s move.

“JAEA’s disbursement of funds for a 40 percent output test in spite of debate on whether to decommission the reactor is a waste of money, and it’s outrageous,” he said.

Source: Mainichi

Related Articles on Page 2…

Useful news and research on the energy and electricity industries.
About author
Read More About
Submit your comment

Please enter your name

Your name is required

Please enter a valid email address

An email address is required

Please enter your message

Enformable © 2016 All Rights Reserved

More in Nuclear News
Protesters shout slogans during an anti-nuclear plant rally in front of the Prime Minister's office in Tokyo, Friday, June 8, 2012 shortly after Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda said Japan must restart two nuclear reactors to protect the economy and people's livelihoods in a news conference. The banners read "We strongly oppose restarting of the Ohi nuclear plant." (Itsuo Inouye / AP)
Japanese Prime Minister’s reiteration of need for atomic energy shows how hard the central government is willing to push to restart nuclear reactors

After the Fukushima nuclear disaster, officials, scientists and experts have been questioning whether nuclear power can still be thought of as reliable, economic, or even safely managed.    The Japanese government however, is not...