The NRC staff is currently reviewing the exemption requests concerning NUHOMS HD-Dry Shielded Canisters being loaded to the incorrect heat load limits at the Surry and North Anna Power Station ISFSIs. The NRC staff has issued a request for supplemental information and Dominion, with the assistance of TN, has provided the ANSYS files used in the the rma l analysis of the exemption request.
The NRC staff requested this telephone conference to clarify the contents of the provided ANSYS files. Upon initial review of the ANSYS files, the NRC staff could not locate the input files to verify the boundary conditions. TN provided details on where the decay heat input s were located in the submittal and explanation on how the ambient temperature input was derived. The NRC staff understood TN’ s response and no additional information was needed at this time.
By letter dated July 21, 2011, as supplemented September 28, 2011, Virginia Electric and Power Company (Dominion) requested exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3) and (b)(11). 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3) and (b)(11) requires a general licensee (under 10 CFR Part 72, Subpart K) to comply with the terms and conditions of the approved Certificate of Compliance (CoC) for the dry cask storage system used at the site.
The exemptions were requested for NUHOMS ® HD Dry Shielded Canisters (DSC), Model No. HD-32PTH, with serial numbers DOM-32PTH-004-C, -005-C, -007-C, -010-C, -013-C, -019-C and GBC-32PTH-011-C due to non-compliance with the terms and conditions of the Transnuclear, Inc., CoC 1030, Amendment No. 0.
At the time of loading, the decay heat limit was exceeded for twelve fuel assemblies.
The twelve fuel assemblies are distributed over the seven identified DSCs.
NRC staff performed an acceptance review of your request to determine if it contains sufficient information to allow the staff to complete the detailed review. This letter acknowledges acceptance of your request. The request appears to contain the information needed for our review. We have established a schedule for the review. The schedule allows for staff to issue a Request for Additional Information (RAI) in late November 2011 and the exemption by early March 2012, based on the applicant responding to RAIs in late December 2011. If no RAI is needed, and based on the staff’s evaluation, the exemption may be issued at approximately that time. In general, no additional changes to the request should be submitted except for changes resulting from your response to an RAI.
- March 19th, 2011 – Risk of further explosions in SPFs – Should SFP be removed to temporary storage? (enformable.com)
- March 18th, 2011 – SPF Issues Investigated – Little Cladding Left – Fuel maybe in form of a rubble bed (enformable.com)
- March 17th 2011- All the Troublesome Reactor Venting and How to Prevent It (enformable.com)
- March 15th, 2011 – The Whole Spent Fuel Pool At Reactor 3 Could Boil Dry In 20 Days (enformable.com)
- March 16th, 2011 – Assessing SFP Damage – SOARCA – Uncovered Spent Fuel Reports – Leak at Unit 4 SFP (enformable.com)
- Earthquake caused massive nuclear storage casks to move at North Anna (enformable.com)
- October 27th, 2011 – North Anna Power Station, Units 1 & 2 – Dominion Again Quotes EPRI Reports in Documents For Restart Readiness Determination Plan (enformable.com)
- NISA releases safety plan for Fukushima plant after cold shutdown – Concern that ‘Cold Shutdown’ Tepco Boasts is Temporary and Unstable (enformable.com)
- Newly released documents expose Japanese Nuclear Safety Organization feared aftershocks at nuclear plant could damage spent fuel rods (enformable.com)
- March 18th, 2011 – Tohoku-Taiheiyou-Oki Earthquake Effects On Japanese Nuclear Power Plants (enformable.com)